| Economic
Development Council Quarterly Report |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Second Quarter 2009 Cost Of
Living |
|
|
|
|
|
| Among the 320 urban areas that have participated in the second
quarter 2009 ACCRA Cost of Living Index, the after-tax cost for a
professional/managerial standard of living ranged from more than twice the
national average in New York (Manhattan) NY to almost 17 percent below the
national average in Douglas, GA. The
ACCRA Cost of Living Index is published quarterly by C2ER – The Council for
Community and Economic Research. |
|
|
| The Ten Most
and Least Expensive Urban Areas in the ACCRA Cost of Living Index (COLI) |
|
|
| Second Quarter
2009 |
|
|
| National
Average for 320 Urban Areas = 100
Bradenton Area = 96.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Most Expensive |
Least Expensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ranking |
Urban Areas |
Index |
Ranking |
Urban Areas |
Index |
|
|
| 1 |
New York (Manhattan), NY |
219.8 |
1 |
Joplin, MO |
82.7 |
|
|
| 2 |
San Francisco, CA |
172.1 |
2 |
Dounglas, GA |
83.2
|
|
|
| 3 |
Honolulu, HI |
162.8
|
3 |
Pryor Creek, OK |
83.4
|
|
|
| 4 |
New York (Queens), NY |
156.0
|
4 |
Harlingen, TX |
85.3
|
|
|
| 5 |
San Jose, CA |
156.0
|
5 |
Palestine-Anderson County, TX |
86.0 |
|
|
| 6 |
Orange County, CA |
151.4
|
6 |
Clarksville, TN |
86.4
|
|
|
| 7 |
Nassau County, NY |
151.4
|
7 |
Muskogee, OK |
86.4
|
|
|
| 8 |
Stamford, CT |
149.0
|
8 |
Tupelo, MS |
86.5
|
|
|
| 9 |
Oakland, CA |
147.9
|
9 |
Morristown, TN |
86.5
|
|
|
| 10 |
Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA |
147.7
|
10 |
Ashland, OH |
86.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The ACCRA Cost of Living Index measures
regional differences in the cost of consumer goods and services, excluding
taxes and non-consumer expenditures, for professional and managerial
households in the top income quintile.
It is based on more than 50,000 prices covering almost 60 different
items for which prices are collected quarterly by chambers of commerce,
economic development organizations or university applied economic centers in
each participating urban area. Small
differences should not be interpreted as a showing a measurable
difference. The composite index is
based on six components – housing, utilities, grocery items, transportation,
health care and miscellaneous goods and services. |
|
|
| Most
Expensive |
Least Expensive |
|
|
| Ranking |
Urban Areas |
COLI Index |
Ranking |
Urban Areas |
COLI |
|
|
| Index |
|
|
| 1 |
New York (Manhattan), NY |
217.5 |
1 |
Douglas, GA |
83.4 |
|
|
| 2 |
New York (Brooklyn), NY |
176.4 |
2 |
Pryor Creek, OK |
83.8 |
|
|
| 3 |
Honolulu, HI |
164.9 |
3 |
Springfield, IL |
84.3 |
|
|
| 4 |
San Francisco, CA |
162.7 |
4 |
Pueblo, CO |
84.5 |
|
|
| 5 |
New York (Queens), NY |
157.7 |
5 |
Broken Arrow, OK |
84.9 |
|
|
| 6 |
San Jose, CA |
156.1 |
6 |
Martinsville-Henry County, VA |
85.5 |
|
|
| 7 |
Truckee, CA |
148.4 |
7 |
Fort Smith, AR |
85.6 |
|
|
| 8 |
Stamford, CT |
147.6 |
8 |
Harlingen, TX |
85.8 |
|
|
| 9 |
Orange County, CA |
147.3 |
9 |
Garden City, KS |
86.0 |
|
|
| 10 |
Nassau County, NY |
144.6 |
10 |
Joplin, MO |
86.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Each quarter, C2ER collects more than 90,000 prices from
communities across the U.S. for the COPI.
This quarter, the C2ER features the communites with the most and least
expensive health care as measured by the health care index number. C2ER collects data on five separate items
to represent the health care component of the index. |
|
|
| The Five Most
and Least Expensive Places for Health Care by Index Number |
|
|
| in the ACCRA
Cost of Living Index (COLI) |
|
|
| Average for
320 Urban Areas = 100 Bradenton
Area = 102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Most
Expensive |
Least
Expensive |
|
|
|
|
| Ranking |
Urban Areas |
Index |
Ranking |
Urban Areas |
Index |
|
|
| 1 |
Fairbanks, AK |
144.0 |
1 |
Dothan, AL |
79.9 |
|
|
| 2 |
Juneau, AK |
140.3 |
2 |
Cedar City, UT |
81.7 |
|
|
| 3 |
New York (Manhattan), NY |
130.4 |
3 |
Hastings, NE |
82.0 |
|
|
| 4 |
Kodiak, AK |
129.1 |
4 |
Hot Springs, AR |
83.7 |
|
|
| 5 |
Anchorage, AK |
125.3 |
5 |
Joplin, MO |
84.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The ACCRA Cost of Living Index measures regional differences in
the cost of consumer goods and services, excluding taxes and non-consumer
expenditures, for professional and managerial households in the top income
quintile. It is based on more than
90,000 prices covering almost 60 different items for which prices are
collected quarterly by chambers of commerce, economic development
organizations or university applied economic centers in each participating
urban area. Small differences should
not be interpreted as a showing a measurable difference. The composite index is based on six
components – housing, utilities, grocery items, transportation, health care
and miscellaneous goods and services. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The average ACCRA cost of living index for the Bradenton area
for the second quarter of 2009 was 96.6 which is slightly below the national
average of 100. In a comparison of ten
national markets, Newark/Elizabeth, NJ was highest with an index of
127.7 The index for housing in the
Bradenton area is 90.3 which is lower than the national average of 100. Please note that this information is not based on the average price of a house in Manatee
County. The Index measures the
differences in a specific house that has four bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, 2,400
square feet, on an 8,000 square foot lot and is
new construction. (Figure A) |
|
|
|
Figure A |
|
|
|
ACCRA Cost of Living Index: Selected Metro Areas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The following chart indicates prices in various markets around
the state of Florida for the second quarter in 2009 (Figure
B). In
a comparison of ten regions in Florida, the Bradenton area ranked 7th in the
composite index. The highest of the
ten regions was Fort Lauderdale, with an index of 118.8 and the lowest, Tampa
with an index of 92.6. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Figure B |
|
|
|
|
|
| Note: Figure B
indicates prices in sample categories.
The entire cost of living survey prices items in almost 60 different
categories. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Taxable sales and sales tax collected in Manatee County both
showed a decrease of 8.5% and 10.4%
respectively over the same period of 2008. (Figure C) |
|
|
|
Figure C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All of the categories, except for the category of consumer
non-durables, showed a decrease over the same period in 2008. In comparison with the state of Florida,
the categories of consumer non-durables & tourism showed a lower
percentage change, while the categories of consumer durables &
auto-related showed a higher percentage change.
(Figure D) |
|
|
|
Figure D: Taxable
sales by selected categories |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Labor |
|
|
| Manatee
County’s average monthly unemployment rate for the second quarter of 2009 was
11.2%.
(Figure E) |
|
|
| Figure E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Manatee
County Six Month |
|
|
| Unemployment
Trend Comparison |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source:
Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|